early cost management equilibrium between experience judgement

  • Home
  • Why is early stages cost management considered equilibrium between experience and judgement
Estimate, Estimation, Civil Engineering, Cost Management, Whole Life Cycle Costing, Optimism Bias

Why is early stages cost management considered equilibrium between experience and judgement

Planning and maintaining control over projected expenditures is necessary for cost management in construction projects. This is relevant to all the project’s knowledge domains. Actual expenditures are proportional to work completed; however, completed work is frequently not identical to scheduled work. Therefore, the best solution is obtained through control, measurement, and calculation of the budgeted cost of the task finished and their comparison to the actual costs.

The two common challenges include choosing the appropriate accounting system and handling scope modifications. The Work Breakdown Structure helps in dealing with these two challenges. A Work Breakdown Structure is a proper accounting plan. To work on the Work Breakdown Structure, you must learn the difference between cost and financial control.

The Significance of Professional Judgement

Management accountants need knowledge and experience but are more likely to become managers with sound judgment. Making decisions based on professional review is a mandatory skill a good manager should possess. This is so because a professional appraisal is required at every stage to decide, including:

  • The projects to be included to suggest more time for troublesome projects.
  • How stretched or constrained the budget can be.
  • Whether cost-cutting will negatively impact long-term prospects.
  • The equilibrium between consumption and investment.
  • Whether revenue and cost projections are reliable.

An essential component of any project’s initial evaluation is the creation of a trustworthy early-stage price projection for its capital cost. The decision-making processes of clients are heavily influenced by such expert guidance. The critical thing to understand is that these early-stage price projections can be made appropriately by an individual equipped with the proper knowledge, experience, and professional judgement skills.

Professional judgments will become even more crucial with artificial intelligence (AI). AI will improve management accounting capabilities, challenge current norms, and automate numerous repetitive processes. Furthermore, with AI supplying better data, a more significant percentage of the remaining tasks will require judgement.

Professional Judgement in Decision Making

Professional judgement is essential for deciding how to allocate resources for an audit, how to assign duties, whether specialised knowledge or skills are required, and how long it will take to conduct an audit. A quality management system at the firm level must also be designed, implemented, and operated using professional judgement.

Professional judgment can be best explained as forming opinions and making decisions that combine personal attributes with pertinent knowledge, experience, and professional norms.

Making a professional judgement involves considering many factors and making decisions based on specific facts and circumstances; each case is unique, so there is no exact formula for making an excellent professional judgment. This implies a lot of flexibility for the person or team exercising professional judgement to choose the best course of action in the given situation. As a result, the mentality is of utmost importance. A reasonable review can only occur if the person or people making the judgement have the correct motivations, understandings, and attitudes.

Knowledge of Biases and Other Important Psychological Elements

Numerous biases can obstruct logical and balanced reasoning. Everyone’s decision-making processes, including those of highly qualified and experienced auditors, can be affected unconsciously by these. Such prejudices could be:

  1. Group Think

The propensity to think or act in ways that limit individual initiative or accountability.

  • Confirmation Bias

There is the propensity to give information that supports an existing belief greater weight than information that contradicts or questions it.

  • Automation Bias

A propensity to favour output produced by automated systems, even when human reasoning or conflicting evidence casts doubt on the accuracy or suitability of such output.

  • Over Confidence

There is a propensity to believe that one is better than others at accurately assessing danger or making other decisions.

  • Anchoring Bias

propensity to evaluate subsequent information inaccurately by using an earlier piece of information as an anchor.

  • Availability Bias

The propensity to give more weight to events or experiences that come to mind right away or are easily accessible than to those that do not is known as the availability bias.

Think About Who Should Be Making This Decision

An excellent technique to ensure a decision is made is to make sure the appropriate person or persons make the judgement. The auditor takes into account the following factors when determining who should make the decision:

  • Having access to coaching, technical advisory services, external experts, training materials, and automated tools and techniques would be part of what they would have access to.
  • The difficulty and significance of the judgement.
  • The necessary experience, expertise, and understanding. 

Clearly State the Problem

The likelihood of coming to the right decision at the end of the judicial process might be severely harmed by inadequately framing the topic being judged. For instance, even if the other phases of the judicial process are done correctly, the ultimate judgement may not meet the desired criteria if the auditor misinterprets their objectives while making the relevant judgement or overlooks a potential alternative that deserves consideration.

Therefore, a crucial component of a successful judgement process is taking the time to adequately describe and comprehend the situation, including any pertinent risks. This step’s two key elements are defining the options and articulating objectives.

Professional judgement ultimately entails choosing the best course of action; clearly stating objectives reveal desired results. These goals, being clearly stated, offer a set of standards by which alternatives will be judged later in the judgement process. The auditor must consider the objectives of the audit, not just the specific goals, for a judgment.

Six Factors That Affect Judgement

  1. What You Consume

This assesses the level of understanding in reading and listening, which necessitates not only absorbing information but also analysing, evaluating, and contextualising it. Being observant about how things are expressed and what is not said, such as topics not addressed in an email or report, is a necessary component of good listening and reading.

  • Whom and What to Trust
  • Emphasising the value of excellent judgement in hiring, evaluating, and promoting people.
  • Confirm the information through verification and comparison.
  • It understands the viewpoint and motivation of the source of the information.
  • Your Knowledge of This

Knowledge and judgement must be combined to use cost management procedures effectively. Experience is crucial in determining how to use that knowledge, yet even while it is regarded appropriately, experience is insufficient. Additionally, it needs to be combined with learning regarding systems, people, technology, and processes.

  • What Do You Think About This?

Cost Managers must know their prejudices because, like other industry professionals, they are susceptible to biases. Taking precautions is fine, but over-aversion to risk is not.

  • How You Decide

Routes to decision-taking can vary; however, in the end, the management accountant’s ability to formulate and present the choice will depend on their professional judgement that is formed by experience, knowledge, and personal qualities.

This involves evaluating whether options have been presented appropriately, if some alternatives—including more radical ones—have been disregarded, and whether the risk has been adequately considered.

  • How You Carry It Out

Implementation involves:

  • Finding the causes of prior failures in carrying out plans
  • Using post-mortems to foresee the ramifications and risks of changes to the plan
  • The use of cases in training improves the chances of implementation success.

Final Thoughts

Regarding cost management of a construction project, the cost manager’s expertise and experience are insufficient for decision-making. The cost manager must have the mandatory skill of professional judgement. A reasonable judgement can only occur if the person or people making the judgement have the correct motivations, understandings, and attitudes.

Planning for projected expenditures cannot be based solely on the knowledge and experience of the decision-maker. But also, the decision maker needs to judge various scenarios and evaluate circumstances to present the final estimations. He will be able to do so by using his professional judgement skills.

leave a comment